Vorträge & Konferenzen

Private Lives, Intimate Readings

This paper’s main goal is to show that Sovi­et notions of pri­va­cy – which were devel­oped in crowd­ed Sovi­et com­mu­nal appart­ments, also known as the kom­mu­nal­ki – can still be found in con­tem­po­rary Russ­ian (micro-)blogs. This find­ing does not come as a sur­prise. Russ­ian Inter­net (Runet) cul­ture is, to a cer­tain extent, quite dif­fer­ent from its ‘West­ern’ coun­ter­parts, which may be explained in part by his­tor­i­cal devel­op­ments. The Sovi­et regime looked upon com­mu­ni­ca­tion tech­nolo­gies as being poten­tial­ly dan­ger­ous and thus, neglect­ed and even hin­dered their devel­op­ment (Schmidt 2011: 55). The Inter­net got avail­able to a larg­er pub­lic audi­ence only after the col­lapse of the Sovi­et union in 1989. Because of this delay, Runet cul­ture until today is quite unique. For exam­ple, Russ­ian blog por­tals (, social net­works (, and search engines ( are wide­ly unknown in the ‘West’, but dom­i­nate the Russ­ian mar­ket.. Of course not all of Runet’s pecu­liar­i­ties can be attrib­uted to tech­ni­cal his­to­ry only. I want to argue that the past Sovi­et expe­ri­ences of Russ­ian blog­gers have influ­ence, too: They shape the per­cep­tion of pri­va­cy and pub­lic­i­ty. This impact of the Sovi­et past can be felt in many exam­ples of Russ­ian online life writ­ing. By means of exam­in­ing the blogs of best-sell­ing fan­ta­sy author Sergei Luk’ianenko (, and the Twit­ter pro­file of Runet poet Linor Gora­lik (, I strive to show that both writ­ers and read­ers of on-line Russ­ian life writ­ing texts still are spell­bound by Sovi­et pri­va­cy con­cep­tions. This fac­tor thus should not be neglect­ed in stud­ies of Russ­ian life writ­ing.





  • Boym, S. 1994. Com­mon Places. Cambridge/Mass.
  • Evans, S. 2011. Sow­jetisch Wohnen. Biele­feld.
  • Gornyj, E. 2009. „Virtual’naia lich­nost’ kak zhanr tvorch­est­va“, in Kon­rado­va, N. et al. (Hg.) Control+Shift. Mosk­va, 211–234.
  • Kaspe, I./Smurova, V. 2002. „, russka­ja ver­si­ja: poplach’ o nem, poka on zhivoj…“. In Neprikos­noven­nyi zapas 4/2002.
  • Markham, A. 2003. „Metaphors Reflect­ing and Shap­ing the Real­i­ty of the Inter­net: Tool, Place, Way of Being“. <> (29. 11. 2012).
  • Rit­ter, M. 2008. All­t­ag im Umbruch. Ham­burg.
  • Rössler, B. 2001. Der Wert des Pri­vat­en. Frankfurt/M.
  • Rut­ten, E. 2009. „Lit­er­arische Weblogs? Was passiert in den Blogs rus­sis­ch­er Autor/innen?“, in Kul­tura (1) 2009, 16–21.
  • Schmidt, H. 2011. Rus­sis­che Lit­er­atur im Inter­net. Biele­feld.
  • Shlapen­tokh, V. 1984. Love, Mar­riage, and Friend­ship in the Sovi­et Union. New York.
  • Shlapen­tokh, V. 1989. Pub­lic and Pri­vate Life of the Sovi­et Peo­ple. New York.
  • Tokar, A. 2009. Metaphors of the Web 2.0. Frankfurt/M.